|
Assume
for a moment that you believe all adult Americans should be “entitled” to a new car every few years. That is,
they have a “right” to a new car. After all, everyone needs transportation, don’t they? And what’s
government for, if not to provide for its citizens?
Assume also that the car vouchers will be worth $10,000. You’ll get a voucher
- a government “certificate” - in the mail every year. You can spend your voucher at any car dealer. It won’t
be worth anything anywhere else – you can’t cash it like a check, nor can you use it to buy a new plasma television
or a new wardrobe or a trip to Disney World. Still, that voucher would be nice to have, wouldn’t it?
What would happen if such car vouchers existed? You could run out and buy a used
car that costs $10,000, and replace it with another used car every year. Or you could wait a few years and, after accumulating
$30,000 worth of vouchers, you could buy a new car costing $30,000. Or, you could take your $10,000 voucher, add $20,000 of
your own money right now, and buy a car for $30,000. The choice is yours to make.
What kind of car could you buy? That’s entirely up to you. The voucher
would be good at any car dealer - a new car dealer, a used car dealer, an import
dealer, a domestic dealer, General Motors, Ford, Chrysler. You’re in the driver’s seat for that decision.
The car dealer you eventually select would accept your voucher or vouchers as
partial or full payment for the car, and turn them in to the government. The government would then send the car dealer a check
equal to the amount of the vouchers it turned in. Aside from having to be concerned with counterfeit vouchers, the plan would
run rather smoothly, and the government agency required to run the program would not have to be very large.
Because the vouchers would essentially be the same as money, every car dealer
would want your voucher business – just as they now want your cash business. Some of their cars are known for being
reliable and safe, some have more horsepower, some have a lot of cup holders, some are more practical, some are sporty, and
some are plain. You are free to buy the car you like. And color, any style, any options. It’s a free market, and you
can make the decision that is best for you.
If you live in a big city, you may have many car dealers near you, giving you
the advantage of shopping around and being a bit choosier in your purchase decision. If you live in a small town you may have
only one car dealer. You may decide to buy your car from that dealer, or you may think it’s worth traveling a few extra
miles to get the car you prefer from the next town. Again, it’s your choice.
Over time, the car dealers that sell the better product, and which treat the
customers, best will thrive. Some will be very successful and will expand their business. Enterprising businessmen will start
new car dealers, wanting to get a portion of the sales generated by the guaranteed, annual vouchers. A few car dealers will
no doubt go out of business from time to time, either because the quality of their cars is not up to par or they simply don’t
know how to treat the customers. In general, however, everything will run pretty smoothly.
No one in the government program will interfere and tell you what kind of car
to buy or where you must buy it. You have total freedom in the car-buying process. The government wouldn’t know what
is best for your particular driving needs anyway, would it? You certainly know better than any bureaucrat whether you need
a sedan or a minivan or a four-wheel drive vehicle. After all, if you’re not smart enough to know what to drive, you’re probably not smart enough to drive in the first place.
Luckily, you live in the United States, where you have some essential
freedoms. In other countries, they do not allow car vouchers. In fact, in many socialist countries, the citizens are not able
to choose the car they would like to drive. Instead, the government manufactures only one brand of car. And although it’s
not a particularly reliable or efficient car, it is very expensive. All cars are the same – drab, four-door sedans,
olive green in color, with no radio and no cup holders. If it breaks down, you may have a difficult time finding replacement
parts. Even if you can find the parts, you will have a hard time finding a good mechanic. That’s another shame, because
the cars aren’t built very well.
The cars aren’t very good because many of the people who work on the assembly
line are lazy, and sloppy, and they don’t care about quality. Nevertheless, they are paid very well. Some of the employees
are excellent, of course, but a strong union protects the worst employees from being fired, so the overall performance on
the production line is quite poor.
In those socialist countries, there are powerful people in the government who
fight very hard to prevent car vouchers from being introduced. (They drive expensive imported cars, of course, paid for with
tax dollars.) They understand that the vouchers are best for the citizens in the long run, but they cannot afford to lose
the support of the union workers in the elections. Staying in power is, for them, much more important that doing what is best
for the citizens. Those people in power usually refer to each other as “comrade.”
In the United States,
people like that refer to each other as “fellow Democrats.”
The next time you hear a politician opposing education
vouchers, think of the car voucher analogy. Then vote for your children, by
voting against that politician. And the next time you hear a teacher arguing against
education vouchers, ask what that teacher fears.
Don Fredrick
November 16, 2008
Copyright 2008, Don Fredrick
|